Best Known (91, 168, s)-Nets in Base 3
(91, 168, 73)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (91, 168, 73)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (26, 64, 36)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 35)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 35)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (27, 104, 37)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26, N(F) = 36, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (26, 64, 36)-net over F3, using
(91, 168, 110)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (91, 168, 110)-net over F3, using
(91, 168, 901)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (91, 168, 902)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (91, 167, 902)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 47 857169 056922 818765 585442 279633 456668 934190 824515 052054 518160 244278 000748 178965 > 3167 [i]