Best Known (57, 171, s)-Nets in Base 3
(57, 171, 48)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (57, 171, 48)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (45, 171, 48)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 45 and N(F) ≥ 48, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
(57, 171, 64)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (57, 171, 64)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (49, 171, 64)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 63)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 49 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 63)-sequence over F3, using
(57, 171, 182)-Net over F3 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (57, 171, 183)-net over F3, because
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(3171, 183, F3, 114) (dual of [183, 12, 115]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(357, 68, F3, 38) (dual of [68, 11, 39]-code), but
- “Gur†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(357, 68, F3, 38) (dual of [68, 11, 39]-code), but
(57, 171, 245)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (57, 171, 246)-net in base 3, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 4157 750924 017741 215571 697958 702642 701423 192378 223977 825329 869071 367521 382469 592829 > 3171 [i]