Best Known (92, 174, s)-Nets in Base 3
(92, 174, 69)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (92, 174, 69)-net over F3, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (92, 180, 69)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (21, 65, 32)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 31)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 31)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (27, 115, 37)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26, N(F) = 36, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (21, 65, 32)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(92, 174, 105)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (92, 174, 105)-net over F3, using
(92, 174, 814)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (92, 174, 815)-net in base 3, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 105334 032535 993048 070083 230915 028715 621110 086363 891868 705837 557079 151670 060659 807247 > 3174 [i]