Best Known (163, 178, s)-Nets in Base 3
(163, 178, 1198735)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (163, 178, 1198735)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (21, 28, 364)-net over F3, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(328, 364, F3, 7, 7) (dual of [(364, 7), 2520, 8]-NRT-code), using
- digital (135, 150, 1198371)-net over F3, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(3150, 1198371, F3, 15, 15) (dual of [(1198371, 15), 17975415, 16]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 7-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(3150, 8388598, F3, 15) (dual of [8388598, 8388448, 16]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3150, large, F3, 15) (dual of [large, large−150, 16]-code), using
- the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 14348906 = 315−1, defining interval I = [1,15], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 16 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3150, large, F3, 15) (dual of [large, large−150, 16]-code), using
- OOA 7-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(3150, 8388598, F3, 15) (dual of [8388598, 8388448, 16]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(3150, 1198371, F3, 15, 15) (dual of [(1198371, 15), 17975415, 16]-NRT-code), using
- digital (21, 28, 364)-net over F3, using
(163, 178, large)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (163, 178, large)-net over F3, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OA(3178, large, F3, 15) (dual of [large, large−178, 16]-code), using
- 28 times code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OA(3150, large, F3, 15) (dual of [large, large−150, 16]-code), using
- the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 14348906 = 315−1, defining interval I = [1,15], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 16 [i]
- 28 times code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OA(3150, large, F3, 15) (dual of [large, large−150, 16]-code), using
(163, 178, large)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (163, 178, large)-net in base 3, because
- 13 times m-reduction [i] would yield (163, 165, large)-net in base 3, but