Best Known (93, 180, s)-Nets in Base 3
(93, 180, 69)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (93, 180, 69)-net over F3, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (93, 183, 69)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (21, 66, 32)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 31)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 31)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (27, 117, 37)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26, N(F) = 36, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (21, 66, 32)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(93, 180, 101)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (93, 180, 101)-net over F3, using
(93, 180, 776)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (93, 180, 777)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (93, 179, 777)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 26 628079 404634 457087 983192 949674 039201 805377 429964 983790 131821 111862 107692 299506 034395 > 3179 [i]