Best Known (89, 184, s)-Nets in Base 3
(89, 184, 65)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (89, 184, 65)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (15, 62, 28)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (27, 122, 37)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26, N(F) = 36, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (15, 62, 28)-net over F3, using
(89, 184, 96)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (89, 184, 96)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 89 and N(F) ≥ 96, using
(89, 184, 616)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (89, 184, 617)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (89, 183, 617)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 2098 373107 096098 792642 440078 270031 452768 473005 989810 514125 520474 735258 643068 528247 165323 > 3183 [i]