Best Known (129, 188, s)-Nets in Base 3
(129, 188, 164)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (129, 188, 164)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (7, 36, 16)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 15)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 15)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (93, 152, 148)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (17, 76, 74)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (17, 76, 74)-net over F9, using
- digital (7, 36, 16)-net over F3, using
(129, 188, 365)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (129, 188, 365)-net over F3, using
(129, 188, 6933)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (129, 188, 6934)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (129, 187, 6934)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 167276 175095 412996 221981 021042 156303 350597 923840 799579 877232 130454 866894 606053 589592 139861 > 3187 [i]