Best Known (100, 195, s)-Nets in Base 3
(100, 195, 73)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (100, 195, 73)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (26, 73, 36)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 35)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 35)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (27, 122, 37)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26, N(F) = 36, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (26, 73, 36)-net over F3, using
(100, 195, 105)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (100, 195, 105)-net over F3, using
(100, 195, 810)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (100, 195, 811)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (100, 194, 811)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 374 447683 951339 889148 987320 654582 139941 974701 294076 999439 782510 373353 593938 749740 770776 670547 > 3194 [i]