Best Known (106, 199, s)-Nets in Base 3
(106, 199, 76)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (106, 199, 76)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (15, 61, 28)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (45, 138, 48)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 45 and N(F) ≥ 48, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (15, 61, 28)-net over F3, using
(106, 199, 121)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (106, 199, 121)-net over F3, using
(106, 199, 973)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (106, 199, 974)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (106, 198, 974)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 29950 265071 552422 110497 447598 765698 565603 431282 555073 743889 681347 994925 435361 708915 268676 336981 > 3198 [i]