Best Known (126, 199, s)-Nets in Base 3
(126, 199, 156)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (126, 199, 156)-net over F3, using
- 9 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (126, 208, 156)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 104, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 104, 78)-net over F9, using
(126, 199, 238)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (126, 199, 238)-net over F3, using
(126, 199, 2969)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (126, 199, 2970)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (126, 198, 2970)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 29555 742154 448299 809216 863869 800674 879146 287046 541053 927508 522558 017762 361877 701552 840265 991913 > 3198 [i]