Best Known (164, 199, s)-Nets in Base 3
(164, 199, 896)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (164, 199, 896)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (163, 199, 896)-net over F3, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (163, 200, 896)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (13, 50, 224)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 223)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 224, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 223)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (13, 50, 224)-net over F81, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (163, 200, 896)-net over F3, using
(164, 199, 4766)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (164, 199, 4766)-net over F3, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(3199, 4766, F3, 35) (dual of [4766, 4567, 36]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3199, 6600, F3, 35) (dual of [6600, 6401, 36]-code), using
- construction X applied to C([0,18]) ⊂ C([0,15]) [i] based on
- linear OA(3193, 6562, F3, 37) (dual of [6562, 6369, 38]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 6562 | 316−1, defining interval I = [0,18], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−18,−17,…,18}|+1 = 38 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(3161, 6562, F3, 31) (dual of [6562, 6401, 32]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 6562 | 316−1, defining interval I = [0,15], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−15,−14,…,15}|+1 = 32 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(36, 38, F3, 3) (dual of [38, 32, 4]-code or 38-cap in PG(5,3)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(36, 48, F3, 3) (dual of [48, 42, 4]-code or 48-cap in PG(5,3)), using
- construction X applied to C([0,18]) ⊂ C([0,15]) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3199, 6600, F3, 35) (dual of [6600, 6401, 36]-code), using
(164, 199, 1294103)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (164, 199, 1294104)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (164, 198, 1294104)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 29512 880363 296021 899566 165755 092365 609991 287926 614543 516955 570982 734071 609960 711274 753442 366769 > 3198 [i]