Best Known (135, 200, s)-Nets in Base 3
(135, 200, 162)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (135, 200, 162)-net over F3, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (135, 206, 162)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (32, 103, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (32, 103, 81)-net over F9, using
(135, 200, 345)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (135, 200, 345)-net over F3, using
(135, 200, 5897)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (135, 200, 5898)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (135, 199, 5898)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 88961 697873 747451 415366 923289 146557 350837 063858 275094 998531 667779 086994 154554 613050 196933 445441 > 3199 [i]