Best Known (105, 202, s)-Nets in Base 3
(105, 202, 74)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (105, 202, 74)-net over F3, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (105, 207, 74)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (27, 78, 37)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26, N(F) = 36, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (27, 129, 37)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3 (see above)
- digital (27, 78, 37)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(105, 202, 113)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (105, 202, 113)-net over F3, using
(105, 202, 886)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (105, 202, 887)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (105, 201, 887)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 834544 936221 499926 489653 793986 991635 416646 570031 194033 326205 401293 979864 301087 414425 267549 986977 > 3201 [i]