Best Known (92, 209, s)-Nets in Base 3
(92, 209, 64)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (92, 209, 64)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 209, 64)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 63)-sequence over F3, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 63)-sequence over F3, using
(92, 209, 96)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (92, 209, 96)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 209, 96)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 89 and N(F) ≥ 96, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
(92, 209, 521)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (92, 209, 522)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (92, 208, 522)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 1766 316957 356358 112952 396376 615501 342549 476325 039178 214740 472631 713084 490651 888674 535577 336195 196469 > 3208 [i]