Best Known (136, 212, s)-Nets in Base 3
(136, 212, 156)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (136, 212, 156)-net over F3, using
- 16 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (136, 228, 156)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 114, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 114, 78)-net over F9, using
(136, 212, 269)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (136, 212, 269)-net over F3, using
(136, 212, 3410)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (136, 212, 3411)-net in base 3, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 141175 057802 808578 213242 971421 879862 804441 907514 549873 305806 617163 402518 698646 136813 728511 131464 321405 > 3212 [i]