Best Known (199, 212, s)-Nets in Base 3
(199, 212, 5592446)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (199, 212, 5592446)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (10, 16, 46)-net over F3, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(316, 46, F3, 6, 6) (dual of [(46, 6), 260, 7]-NRT-code), using
- appending kth column [i] based on linear OOA(316, 46, F3, 5, 6) (dual of [(46, 5), 214, 7]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- linear OOA(33, 4, F3, 5, 3) (dual of [(4, 5), 17, 4]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(5;17,3) [i]
- linear OOA(313, 42, F3, 5, 6) (dual of [(42, 5), 197, 7]-NRT-code), using
- extracting embedded OOA [i] based on digital (7, 13, 42)-net over F3, using
- linear OOA(33, 4, F3, 5, 3) (dual of [(4, 5), 17, 4]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- appending kth column [i] based on linear OOA(316, 46, F3, 5, 6) (dual of [(46, 5), 214, 7]-NRT-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(316, 46, F3, 6, 6) (dual of [(46, 6), 260, 7]-NRT-code), using
- digital (183, 196, 5592400)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (85, 98, 2796200)-net over F9, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(998, 2796200, F9, 14, 13) (dual of [(2796200, 14), 39146702, 14]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 3-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OOA(998, 8388601, F9, 2, 13) (dual of [(8388601, 2), 16777104, 14]-NRT-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(998, 8388602, F9, 2, 13) (dual of [(8388602, 2), 16777106, 14]-NRT-code), using
- trace code [i] based on linear OOA(8149, 4194301, F81, 2, 13) (dual of [(4194301, 2), 8388553, 14]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(8149, 8388602, F81, 13) (dual of [8388602, 8388553, 14]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8149, large, F81, 13) (dual of [large, large−49, 14]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 21523361 | 818−1, defining interval I = [0,6], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−6,−5,…,6}|+1 = 14 (BCH-bound) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8149, large, F81, 13) (dual of [large, large−49, 14]-code), using
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(8149, 8388602, F81, 13) (dual of [8388602, 8388553, 14]-code), using
- trace code [i] based on linear OOA(8149, 4194301, F81, 2, 13) (dual of [(4194301, 2), 8388553, 14]-NRT-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(998, 8388602, F9, 2, 13) (dual of [(8388602, 2), 16777106, 14]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 3-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OOA(998, 8388601, F9, 2, 13) (dual of [(8388601, 2), 16777104, 14]-NRT-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(998, 2796200, F9, 14, 13) (dual of [(2796200, 14), 39146702, 14]-NRT-code), using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (85, 98, 2796200)-net over F9, using
- digital (10, 16, 46)-net over F3, using
(199, 212, large)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (199, 212, large)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (198, 212, large)-net over F3, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (198, 216, large)-net over F3, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OA(3216, large, F3, 18) (dual of [large, large−216, 19]-code), using
- 36 times code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OA(3180, large, F3, 18) (dual of [large, large−180, 19]-code), using
- the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 14348906 = 315−1, defining interval I = [1,18], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 19 [i]
- 36 times code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OA(3180, large, F3, 18) (dual of [large, large−180, 19]-code), using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OA(3216, large, F3, 18) (dual of [large, large−216, 19]-code), using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (198, 216, large)-net over F3, using
(199, 212, large)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (199, 212, large)-net in base 3, because
- 11 times m-reduction [i] would yield (199, 201, large)-net in base 3, but