Best Known (198, 213, s)-Nets in Base 3
(198, 213, 3595113)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (198, 213, 3595113)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (56, 71, 1198371)-net over F27, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(2771, 1198371, F27, 15, 15) (dual of [(1198371, 15), 17975494, 16]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 7-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(2771, 8388598, F27, 15) (dual of [8388598, 8388527, 16]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2771, large, F27, 15) (dual of [large, large−71, 16]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 14348908 | 2710−1, defining interval I = [0,7], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−7,−6,…,7}|+1 = 16 (BCH-bound) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2771, large, F27, 15) (dual of [large, large−71, 16]-code), using
- OOA 7-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(2771, 8388598, F27, 15) (dual of [8388598, 8388527, 16]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(2771, 1198371, F27, 15, 15) (dual of [(1198371, 15), 17975494, 16]-NRT-code), using
(198, 213, large)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (198, 213, large)-net over F3, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (198, 216, large)-net over F3, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OA(3216, large, F3, 18) (dual of [large, large−216, 19]-code), using
- 36 times code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OA(3180, large, F3, 18) (dual of [large, large−180, 19]-code), using
- the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 14348906 = 315−1, defining interval I = [1,18], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 19 [i]
- 36 times code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OA(3180, large, F3, 18) (dual of [large, large−180, 19]-code), using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OA(3216, large, F3, 18) (dual of [large, large−216, 19]-code), using
(198, 213, large)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (198, 213, large)-net in base 3, because
- 13 times m-reduction [i] would yield (198, 200, large)-net in base 3, but