Best Known (145, 214, s)-Nets in Base 3
(145, 214, 164)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (145, 214, 164)-net over F3, using
- 31 times duplication [i] based on digital (144, 213, 164)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (7, 41, 16)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 15)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 15)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (103, 172, 148)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (17, 86, 74)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (17, 86, 74)-net over F9, using
- digital (7, 41, 16)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(145, 214, 375)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (145, 214, 375)-net over F3, using
(145, 214, 6565)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (145, 214, 6566)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (145, 213, 6566)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 424689 838510 520432 813982 351904 656336 990929 616499 709143 426273 745287 037058 422530 991469 334273 951254 351213 > 3213 [i]