Best Known (136, 219, s)-Nets in Base 3
(136, 219, 156)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (136, 219, 156)-net over F3, using
- 9 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (136, 228, 156)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 114, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 114, 78)-net over F9, using
(136, 219, 236)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (136, 219, 236)-net over F3, using
(136, 219, 2737)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (136, 219, 2738)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (136, 218, 2738)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 102 910643 288667 994709 684702 048257 118187 722796 864654 465348 697460 059195 640848 912135 721252 345954 229732 065877 > 3218 [i]