Best Known (105, 224, s)-Nets in Base 3
(105, 224, 72)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (105, 224, 72)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (105, 71)-sequence over F3, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (17, 71)-sequence over F9, using
- s-reduction based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- s-reduction based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (17, 71)-sequence over F9, using
(105, 224, 104)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (105, 224, 104)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (102, 224, 104)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (102, 103)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 102 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (102, 103)-sequence over F3, using
(105, 224, 668)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (105, 224, 669)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (105, 223, 669)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 25147 951702 152525 279789 548470 574913 935949 748610 416511 276032 960573 373430 295396 223051 269615 563182 937053 877867 > 3223 [i]