Best Known (136, 224, s)-Nets in Base 3
(136, 224, 156)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (136, 224, 156)-net over F3, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (136, 228, 156)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 114, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 114, 78)-net over F9, using
(136, 224, 217)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (136, 224, 217)-net over F3, using
(136, 224, 2273)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (136, 224, 2274)-net in base 3, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 75649 711664 650776 357624 349590 345783 163868 154736 797855 906772 752603 696026 004071 399336 551529 908053 302346 878649 > 3224 [i]