Best Known (106, 225, s)-Nets in Base 3
(106, 225, 73)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (106, 225, 73)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (106, 72)-sequence over F3, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (17, 72)-sequence over F9, using
- s-reduction based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- s-reduction based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (17, 72)-sequence over F9, using
(106, 225, 104)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (106, 225, 104)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (102, 225, 104)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (102, 103)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 102 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (102, 103)-sequence over F3, using
(106, 225, 682)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (106, 225, 683)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (106, 224, 683)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 77867 286345 542000 227138 434585 688508 642497 613086 691741 485973 165848 530212 890039 427085 015173 164229 441264 904795 > 3224 [i]