Best Known (115, 226, s)-Nets in Base 3
(115, 226, 76)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (115, 226, 76)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (15, 70, 28)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (45, 156, 48)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 45 and N(F) ≥ 48, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (15, 70, 28)-net over F3, using
(115, 226, 120)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (115, 226, 120)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (113, 226, 120)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (113, 119)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 113 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (113, 119)-sequence over F3, using
(115, 226, 901)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (115, 226, 902)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (115, 225, 902)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 228681 648590 115623 648511 699902 264003 553129 749772 925854 343528 875092 435014 266571 149357 449554 704257 737026 183993 > 3225 [i]