Best Known (136, 226, s)-Nets in Base 3
(136, 226, 156)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (136, 226, 156)-net over F3, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (136, 228, 156)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 114, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 114, 78)-net over F9, using
(136, 226, 210)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (136, 226, 210)-net over F3, using
(136, 226, 2150)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (136, 226, 2151)-net in base 3, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 682697 273870 385894 568800 207331 020114 046522 894462 720340 866490 854232 287999 144981 198685 132762 410653 052718 679735 > 3226 [i]