Best Known (143, 226, s)-Nets in Base 3
(143, 226, 156)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (143, 226, 156)-net over F3, using
- 16 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (143, 242, 156)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 121, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 121, 78)-net over F9, using
(143, 226, 266)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (143, 226, 266)-net over F3, using
(143, 226, 3311)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (143, 226, 3312)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (143, 225, 3312)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 227427 661816 529813 740483 456671 482583 207730 632384 145947 945428 014167 336724 511505 957596 300834 815740 599525 519585 > 3225 [i]