Best Known (146, 226, s)-Nets in Base 3
(146, 226, 162)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (146, 226, 162)-net over F3, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (146, 228, 162)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (32, 114, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (32, 114, 81)-net over F9, using
(146, 226, 295)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (146, 226, 295)-net over F3, using
(146, 226, 3873)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (146, 226, 3874)-net in base 3, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 678318 055613 833756 883760 913440 044757 341433 295134 074129 362164 017319 249255 430632 052431 946033 949702 150410 670481 > 3226 [i]