Best Known (93, 226, s)-Nets in Base 3
(93, 226, 64)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (93, 226, 64)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 226, 64)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 63)-sequence over F3, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 63)-sequence over F3, using
(93, 226, 96)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (93, 226, 96)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 226, 96)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 89 and N(F) ≥ 96, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
(93, 226, 475)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (93, 226, 476)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (93, 225, 476)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 242279 956768 418745 758259 359032 653916 050711 532555 319113 078306 019165 493058 942578 149739 436775 173391 864736 663881 > 3225 [i]