Best Known (96, 226, s)-Nets in Base 3
(96, 226, 64)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (96, 226, 64)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 226, 64)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 63)-sequence over F3, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 63)-sequence over F3, using
(96, 226, 96)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (96, 226, 96)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 226, 96)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 89 and N(F) ≥ 96, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
(96, 226, 509)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (96, 226, 510)-net in base 3, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 730752 353040 624336 568039 280957 894028 823095 294723 773165 808454 301159 726575 800421 159890 874774 264834 109119 800189 > 3226 [i]