Best Known (126, 227, s)-Nets in Base 3
(126, 227, 85)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (126, 227, 85)-net over F3, using
- 7 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (126, 234, 85)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (27, 81, 37)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26, N(F) = 36, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (45, 153, 48)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 45 and N(F) ≥ 48, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (27, 81, 37)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(126, 227, 155)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (126, 227, 155)-net over F3, using
(126, 227, 1348)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (126, 227, 1349)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (126, 226, 1349)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 692482 516907 068886 528408 783811 451177 606229 076528 326912 882173 490941 364197 839432 683195 250145 151122 423247 735697 > 3226 [i]