Best Known (145, 228, s)-Nets in Base 3
(145, 228, 156)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (145, 228, 156)-net over F3, using
- 18 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (145, 246, 156)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 123, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 123, 78)-net over F9, using
(145, 228, 275)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (145, 228, 275)-net over F3, using
(145, 228, 3495)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (145, 228, 3496)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (145, 227, 3496)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 2 034005 408132 536847 775262 659464 096258 372479 701274 467942 861573 583735 739665 952071 176496 425721 007341 882674 640593 > 3227 [i]