Best Known (100, 229, s)-Nets in Base 3
(100, 229, 67)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (100, 229, 67)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (100, 66)-sequence over F3, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (17, 66)-sequence over F9, using
- s-reduction based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- s-reduction based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (17, 66)-sequence over F9, using
(100, 229, 96)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (100, 229, 96)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 229, 96)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 89 and N(F) ≥ 96, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
(100, 229, 557)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (100, 229, 558)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (100, 228, 558)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 6 722689 082073 959405 315535 269825 369035 812563 453453 280980 359463 537444 613860 939672 589813 935055 899623 900117 927553 > 3228 [i]