Best Known (104, 229, s)-Nets in Base 3
(104, 229, 71)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (104, 229, 71)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (104, 70)-sequence over F3, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (17, 70)-sequence over F9, using
- s-reduction based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- s-reduction based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (17, 70)-sequence over F9, using
(104, 229, 104)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (104, 229, 104)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (102, 229, 104)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (102, 103)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 102 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (102, 103)-sequence over F3, using
(104, 229, 620)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (104, 229, 621)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (104, 228, 621)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 6 210016 549193 726509 228175 319526 686541 273090 601289 304360 433078 703128 222982 052776 569278 161583 045996 268746 286769 > 3228 [i]