Best Known (140, 229, s)-Nets in Base 3
(140, 229, 156)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (140, 229, 156)-net over F3, using
- 7 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (140, 236, 156)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 118, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 118, 78)-net over F9, using
(140, 229, 228)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (140, 229, 228)-net over F3, using
(140, 229, 2516)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (140, 229, 2517)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (140, 228, 2517)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 6 091576 198396 651505 387197 439399 792795 242059 692457 765449 476366 476750 673189 850876 513376 802684 782994 015568 807985 > 3228 [i]