Best Known (143, 232, s)-Nets in Base 3
(143, 232, 156)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (143, 232, 156)-net over F3, using
- 10 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (143, 242, 156)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 121, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 121, 78)-net over F9, using
(143, 232, 240)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (143, 232, 240)-net over F3, using
(143, 232, 2715)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (143, 232, 2716)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (143, 231, 2716)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 164 169588 871885 660021 951028 839973 621212 362522 855333 795547 123199 184359 370274 964569 020960 810957 693944 269852 023105 > 3231 [i]