Best Known (100, 233, s)-Nets in Base 3
(100, 233, 67)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (100, 233, 67)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (100, 66)-sequence over F3, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (17, 66)-sequence over F9, using
- s-reduction based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- s-reduction based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (17, 66)-sequence over F9, using
(100, 233, 96)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (100, 233, 96)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 233, 96)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 89 and N(F) ≥ 96, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
(100, 233, 541)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (100, 233, 542)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (100, 232, 542)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 517 821657 184002 233834 158588 603162 661648 777673 839933 629430 335363 029797 695049 441721 922688 668012 771603 690435 011645 > 3232 [i]