Best Known (140, 233, s)-Nets in Base 3
(140, 233, 156)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (140, 233, 156)-net over F3, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (140, 236, 156)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 118, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 118, 78)-net over F9, using
(140, 233, 215)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (140, 233, 215)-net over F3, using
(140, 233, 2248)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (140, 233, 2249)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (140, 232, 2249)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 495 697983 536145 490807 821249 262201 007016 896296 357996 576253 320988 087924 939000 883039 038176 964296 940513 004345 299529 > 3232 [i]