Best Known (143, 233, s)-Nets in Base 3
(143, 233, 156)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (143, 233, 156)-net over F3, using
- 9 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (143, 242, 156)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 121, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 121, 78)-net over F9, using
(143, 233, 236)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (143, 233, 236)-net over F3, using
(143, 233, 2559)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (143, 233, 2560)-net in base 3, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 1492 020600 319870 440599 132623 727764 350456 552497 616832 221100 401271 445853 639005 460736 535384 950160 852668 234883 396609 > 3233 [i]