Best Known (104, 235, s)-Nets in Base 3
(104, 235, 71)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (104, 235, 71)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (104, 70)-sequence over F3, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (17, 70)-sequence over F9, using
- s-reduction based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- s-reduction based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (17, 70)-sequence over F9, using
(104, 235, 104)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (104, 235, 104)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (102, 235, 104)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (102, 103)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 102 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (102, 103)-sequence over F3, using
(104, 235, 591)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (104, 235, 592)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (104, 234, 592)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 4597 610219 392235 869862 051091 608056 324020 483607 271202 262580 277474 820628 579993 101058 463982 934408 521848 686625 455265 > 3234 [i]