Best Known (144, 235, s)-Nets in Base 3
(144, 235, 156)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (144, 235, 156)-net over F3, using
- 9 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (144, 244, 156)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 122, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 122, 78)-net over F9, using
(144, 235, 236)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (144, 235, 236)-net over F3, using
(144, 235, 2623)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (144, 235, 2624)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (144, 234, 2624)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 4449 530377 275334 526413 102017 664016 468882 039099 570229 503429 828677 151690 241257 986256 065210 259488 713748 315356 782721 > 3234 [i]