Best Known (90, 235, s)-Nets in Base 3
(90, 235, 64)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (90, 235, 64)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 235, 64)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 63)-sequence over F3, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 63)-sequence over F3, using
(90, 235, 96)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (90, 235, 96)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 235, 96)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 89 and N(F) ≥ 96, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
(90, 235, 423)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (90, 235, 424)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (90, 234, 424)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 4740 952793 202809 502322 635711 703753 888713 598836 607031 525516 681223 611765 222813 424522 338187 693944 337930 142909 373697 > 3234 [i]