Best Known (161, 236, s)-Nets in Base 3
(161, 236, 176)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (161, 236, 176)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (15, 52, 28)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (109, 184, 148)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (17, 92, 74)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (17, 92, 74)-net over F9, using
- digital (15, 52, 28)-net over F3, using
(161, 236, 427)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (161, 236, 427)-net over F3, using
(161, 236, 7820)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (161, 236, 7821)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (161, 235, 7821)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 13327 568681 934610 512658 422205 078977 024654 703081 498233 972614 122910 236696 487037 488500 911198 585044 202148 991860 348843 > 3235 [i]