MinT - Best Known (126, 239, s)-Nets in Base 3

Best Known (126, 239, s)-Nets in Base 3

(126, 239, 80)-Net over F₃ — Constructive and digital

Digital (126, 239, 80)-net over F₃, using

7 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (126, 246, 80)-net over F₃, using
- (u,Â u+v)-construction [i] based on
  1. digital (21, 81, 32)-net over F₃, using
    - net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 31)-sequence over F₃, using
      - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₃ with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 32, using
        an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
  2. digital (45, 165, 48)-net over F₃, using
    - net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F₃, using
      - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₃ with g(F) = 45 and N(F) ≥ 48, using
        an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]

(126, 239, 137)-Net over F₃ — Digital

Digital (126, 239, 137)-net over F₃, using

Gilbertâ€“VarÅ¡amov bound [i]

(126, 239, 1102)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s

There is no (126, 239, 1103)-net in base 3, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (126, 238, 1103)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3^mÂ â‰¥ 364151 553620 744739 705125 373797 045970 807061 803825 428485 210975 435888 246302 246017 924653 200289 894625 114120 296290 208401 > 3²³⁸ [i]