Best Known (144, 239, s)-Nets in Base 3
(144, 239, 156)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (144, 239, 156)-net over F3, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (144, 244, 156)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 122, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 122, 78)-net over F9, using
(144, 239, 222)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (144, 239, 222)-net over F3, using
(144, 239, 2347)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (144, 239, 2348)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (144, 238, 2348)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 359468 404793 964999 698309 144793 926383 836483 239295 595354 782919 743367 868958 931688 453256 289870 577364 703143 854696 916753 > 3238 [i]