Best Known (105, 240, s)-Nets in Base 3
(105, 240, 72)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (105, 240, 72)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (105, 71)-sequence over F3, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (17, 71)-sequence over F9, using
- s-reduction based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- s-reduction based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (17, 71)-sequence over F9, using
(105, 240, 104)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (105, 240, 104)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (102, 240, 104)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (102, 103)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 102 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (102, 103)-sequence over F3, using
(105, 240, 585)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (105, 240, 586)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (105, 239, 586)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 1 158699 285443 308266 402297 066909 777451 298009 045524 797824 311682 923495 398321 215877 567524 845783 026625 859681 174956 281393 > 3239 [i]