Best Known (126, 243, s)-Nets in Base 3
(126, 243, 80)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (126, 243, 80)-net over F3, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (126, 246, 80)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (21, 81, 32)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 31)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 31)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (45, 165, 48)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 45 and N(F) ≥ 48, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (21, 81, 32)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(126, 243, 132)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (126, 243, 132)-net over F3, using
(126, 243, 1042)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (126, 243, 1043)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (126, 242, 1043)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 29 708298 196483 190884 331450 825870 995434 788421 037186 760748 833893 312073 069074 167838 397461 191543 323894 594318 703765 196949 > 3242 [i]