Best Known (134, 243, s)-Nets in Base 3
(134, 243, 86)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (134, 243, 86)-net over F3, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (134, 248, 86)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (32, 89, 38)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 37)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 38, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 37)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (45, 159, 48)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 45 and N(F) ≥ 48, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (32, 89, 38)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(134, 243, 161)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (134, 243, 161)-net over F3, using
(134, 243, 1388)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (134, 243, 1389)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (134, 242, 1389)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 29 604687 332288 184366 040821 895432 123848 406386 457157 229688 402065 394255 748827 509813 631680 281976 854814 781617 547635 232017 > 3242 [i]