Best Known (162, 243, s)-Nets in Base 3
(162, 243, 164)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (162, 243, 164)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (7, 47, 16)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 15)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 15)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (115, 196, 148)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (17, 98, 74)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (17, 98, 74)-net over F9, using
- digital (7, 47, 16)-net over F3, using
(162, 243, 377)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (162, 243, 377)-net over F3, using
(162, 243, 6032)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (162, 243, 6033)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (162, 242, 6033)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 29 103810 503185 562185 546257 345309 670947 517769 002825 179757 990574 859064 703747 784406 236907 158684 543242 769317 478576 494625 > 3242 [i]