Best Known (164, 245, s)-Nets in Base 3
(164, 245, 167)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (164, 245, 167)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (9, 49, 19)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 18)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 19, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 18)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (115, 196, 148)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (17, 98, 74)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (17, 98, 74)-net over F9, using
- digital (9, 49, 19)-net over F3, using
(164, 245, 389)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (164, 245, 389)-net over F3, using
(164, 245, 6375)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (164, 245, 6376)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (164, 244, 6376)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 262 120545 406158 583577 838166 632361 822495 695246 143001 698552 907568 834577 374337 367807 637224 452652 087654 609678 176823 768321 > 3244 [i]