Best Known (165, 248, s)-Nets in Base 3
(165, 248, 164)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (165, 248, 164)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (7, 48, 16)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 15)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 15)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (117, 200, 148)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (17, 100, 74)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (17, 100, 74)-net over F9, using
- digital (7, 48, 16)-net over F3, using
(165, 248, 379)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (165, 248, 379)-net over F3, using
(165, 248, 6002)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (165, 248, 6003)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (165, 247, 6003)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 7084 314019 364815 522345 187007 204853 556304 526343 762149 192078 798498 476585 581571 444316 878132 544931 846007 676785 105258 159447 > 3247 [i]