Best Known (35, 48, s)-Nets in Base 3
(35, 48, 156)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (35, 48, 156)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 16, 52)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 51)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 52, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 51)-sequence over F27, using
(35, 48, 259)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (35, 48, 259)-net over F3, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(348, 259, F3, 13) (dual of [259, 211, 14]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(348, 265, F3, 13) (dual of [265, 217, 14]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(12) ⊂ Ce(7) [i] based on
- linear OA(341, 243, F3, 13) (dual of [243, 202, 14]-code), using an extension Ce(12) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 242 = 35−1, defining interval I = [1,12], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 13 [i]
- linear OA(326, 243, F3, 8) (dual of [243, 217, 9]-code), using an extension Ce(7) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 242 = 35−1, defining interval I = [1,7], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 8 [i]
- linear OA(37, 22, F3, 4) (dual of [22, 15, 5]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(37, 26, F3, 4) (dual of [26, 19, 5]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 26 = 33−1, defining interval I = [0,2], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 5 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(37, 26, F3, 4) (dual of [26, 19, 5]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(12) ⊂ Ce(7) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(348, 265, F3, 13) (dual of [265, 217, 14]-code), using
(35, 48, 8172)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (35, 48, 8173)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (35, 47, 8173)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 26600 446757 118314 916177 > 347 [i]